Loading…
4
The JFK files are public, so why are we still arguing about a second shooter?
I spent three nights last week reading through the released files from the National Archives, and the weirdest thing hit me. People keep pointing at the same grainy frames and the same witness statements, but they skip the chain of custody issues that actually matter. The whole debate hinges on one autopsy photo that has a documented 4 inch discrepancy in the wound location between the original report and the later version. That alone should shift the argument from who fired to who handled the evidence. But every thread I see goes straight back to exit wound angles and Zapruder timing. Has anyone actually compared the original Warren Commission exhibits to the 2017 release side by side, or do we just keep recycling the same talking points?
1 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In1 Comment
luna_jackson287d ago
Pull up the actual exhibits side by side and you'll see it fast.
3