11
The whole 'Vikings wore horned helmets' thing needs to die already
I keep seeing movies and even some museum displays showing Vikings with horned helmets. But we know from actual archaeology - like the Gjermundbu helmet find from 1943 in Norway - that real Viking helmets were simple iron caps with no horns. The horned myth started in the 1800s from opera costumes. Why do people still push this? It makes actual Viking archaeology seem made up to casual viewers. Has anyone else had to correct a tour guide or documentary about this specific detail?
3 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In3 Comments
thomasm4112h ago
Isn't it funny how a 150-year-old opera costume gets more traction than actual archaeological evidence? I see the same thing with those "medieval torture devices" in tourist shops, half of which were Victorian inventions sold as authentic. People just love a good visual story more than boring old facts. That Gjermundbu helmet is the real deal, a simple iron cap, but it doesn't make for a cool movie poster. We'd rather believe in horned warriors than accept that history was mostly practical and unglamorous.
4
logan_white5910h ago
Wait, isn't that Gjermundbu helmet actually the one with the eye guard and chainmail bits? Not trying to be that guy, but it's got those distinctive brow ridges that make it look like a face, which is still pretty plain compared to the horned stuff. You're totally right about the Victorian torture device thing though. I remember reading that the "pear of anguish" was basically a 19th century joke that got taken way too seriously. People just want their history to look dramatic, even if it means believing in vikings with giant hats and churches full of iron maidens that were actually made last Tuesday.
5